|
Copyright 2003, all rights reserved
More seashells, Vanished animals, High noon
Q: Eastern seashore beaches seem generally "loaded" with
seashells, whereas Western beaches are not. Is this because warm waters of the
Gulf Stream are near to the Eastern shore? —E.W.T., Clovis, California
[ Richard B. Mieremet, NOAA] Low tide along
South Carolina beach shows seashells
A: Experts I’ve consulted know of no study looking into the issue but Jesús
Pineda, biologist at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute offers clues supporting
your idea.
Cooler water dissolves seashells faster. The Gulf Stream flowing north
along eastern United States does indeed make Atlantic coastal waters warmer than
the Pacific along the U.S. western shore. Furthermore, chalky substances like
seashells dissolve faster in cooler waters. "Thus, even if you start with the
same density of seashells on eastern and western beaches, you would end up with
lower densities on western beaches than on eastern ones because the shells would
disappear faster in western colder waters," says Pineda.
Bivalves’ favor eastern beaches. Most seashells are bivalves (two hinged
shells like a clam’s) and these creatures like to live in soft sediment. So,
they favor sandy beaches over rocky coastlines.
Long, trailing tectonic ledges form the eastern shoreline as the Eurasian
Plate pulls away from the North American Plate and the Atlantic Ocean widens.
The broad ledges drain the gently sloping land into many rivers that wash
sediment out to sea. Thus, sandy beaches predominate along the east coast—the
kind that bivalves love.
On the other hand, the Pacific Plate colliding with the North American Plate
forms an abrupt western coast. Consequently, the U.S. western coastline has a
smaller drainage area and less sediment to form beaches.
That’s why more bivalves—the most abundant seashell—exist along eastern than
western shores.
But, of course, there are exceptions. The shores of the Gulf of California
have "the highest densities of seashells I have ever seen," says Pineda.
Further Surfing:
WonderQuest: The widening Atlantic Ocean
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: Dive and discover
Q: What caused the mass extinctions? —Shirley, Panama
City, Florida
[April
Holladay] Mass extinction time line
A: About five mass extinctions have devastated life over its 4-billion
history. The first and one of the most devastating extinctions was caused by an ice age
450 million years ago. It coincided with the greatest extent of ice-age
glaciers. Many animal and plant genera (whole groups of species) died and
diversity withered. Then, about 350 million years ago, both plant and animal
species died slowly on a massive scale. The extinction event coincided with and
perhaps was caused by seas that fell to low levels and volcanoes that belched
noxious fumes.
The next two mass extinctions happened fairly close together: 250 and 200
million years ago. Ninety-six percent of the world’s species perished 250
million years ago in the greatest mass extinction in Earth’s history. Falling
sea levels, rising temperatures, and volcanic fumes may have been responsible.
The next, 50 million years later, wiped out 65 % of marine animals and 90 % of
land plant species. We’ve identified two likely causes: temperature and meteor
impact. Temperatures rose dramatically, apparently due to a greenhouse effect. A
meteor fell, smashing Quebec, Canada and blasting one of the largest known
craters. The debris clouded the atmosphere and blocked sunlight reaching Earth.
The last and most famous mass extinction occurred 65 million years ago. It
devastated dinosaurs—not to mention: flying reptiles, swimming reptiles,
belemnites, ammonites, specialized bivalves of the oceans, and many fish. An
asteroid or comet may have crashed explosively off the Yucatan coast and killed
the reptiles.
Mass extinctions give other species a chance to fill old niches. Were it not
for the last one, we might all be reptiles instead of naked apes.
Q: How do we know what time it really is? I know we can measure time
intervals very accurately, but what do we use to set the time? —Eric B.
[Commander John Bortniak NOAA] Our timepiece: the Sun
A: Setting time is as arbitrary as setting zero on a circle. We have
different approaches. Let’s discuss time in a frame of reference that’s moving
at a constant speed: Earth.
"[Time] presents to us a sequence of changes," says Guy Ottewell in his book,
The Astronomical Companion. We use the periodic transitions to set time.
The change that dominates our lives is daylight: coming and going. Sundials
measure Sun time. We set them to the time we measure most reliably—high noon,
when the Sun is nearly overhead and due south (north for folks in the Southern
Hemisphere). This illustrates a point nicely: time is direction (at noon the
sunward direction is south). It’s called "true", "Sun", or "apparent" time.
However, Sun time is inconvenient since it varies over Earth and through the
year.
"Standard time" is handier. The year is divided into equal days, each 24
hours long. Within a time zone, people set their clock to the same time,
determined originally by the Royal Observatory at Greenwich (built in 1675).
Since Greenwich set up the system, longitude 0°
passes through their observatory near London. A person standing at Greenwich
Observatory at noon Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) can see the Sun due south. Before
1925, GMT ran from noon to noon and we still speak of a.m. or p.m.—before or
after noon.
"From 1925 on, the GMT day was changed to run from midnight to midnight,"
says Robert Massey, astronomer at the Royal Observatory at Greenwich. However,
GMT isn’t really defined now. The time function moved years ago to the National
Physical Laboratory in southwest London. GMT is related to Coordinated Universal
Time (UTC) in some contexts and to Universal Time (UT) in others. UTC is a more
accurate atomic timescale; UT is based on Earth’s rotation. Timekeepers correct
UT to UTC time through the use of leap seconds that compensate for the slowing
of the Earth’s rotation over the years, says Massey.
Astronomers give astronomical event times in UT. For example, the closest
conjunction of planets this year occurs on March 28 at 13h UT, which is 13 - 5 =
8 a.m. EST (Eastern Standard Time).
EST lags GMT by five hours because the east U.S. coastal states are west of
London by 75 longitudinal degrees. Earth spins from west to east at a rate of 15
degrees per hour. So it takes five hours for New Yorkers to see the Sun (nearly)
overhead after it's noon in Greenwich/London.
By the way, not all countries, even today, use standard time. Saudi Arabia
still uses Sun time and Saudis know it’s noon when the Sun is due south and
passes nearly overhead.
Further Surfing:
The Royal Observatory Greenwich: What is Time?
U.S. Naval Observatory: Time FAQ
(Answered March 28, 2003)
|