|
Reptiles see color, no 24-hour flu, gravitons carry gravity
Q:
Do reptiles see in color like birds and humans? Do they see things in their
visual spectrum that we don't (like birds seeing into the ultraviolet)? John, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Two rainbow views. The left is how we perceive it and the
right is how many reptiles (including dinosaurs) might see it. [M.P. Rowe,
Palaeontologia Electronica]
A: Yes, many reptiles appear to see in color much as
birds do but unlike humans. What a perceptive question! As you imply, seeing in
color depends on the animal. Different species can look at the same object but
see different colors and patterns.
Human eyes have three types of color cones that absorb red,
blue, and green light best. These colors are primary for us. Many reptiles (11
species) have four color cone types and, consequently, have four primary colors.
They see a different world.
We see a blue sky. A reptile may see a green one or some other
color we can’t even dream of. Turtles, lizards, and birds can see in ultraviolet
and probably dinosaurs could too. Imagine a reddish-ultraviolet rose. I can’t. A
turtle might see such a combination, though.
A rainbow illustrates some of the differences among birds,
reptiles, and humans. Probably all birds perceive rainbows but the colors are
too close together for many reptiles to resolve, says Mickey Rowe,
neuroscientist at University of California, Santa Barbara.
Their eye optics is too poor and they have too sparse a
density of color-sensing cones. Also, humans may see more bow hues, not because
we have more cone types (we generally have fewer) but because we have vastly
more neurons than reptiles to process visual information.
Further Surfing:
WonderQuest:
Color — all in the eye of the beholder
Palaeontologia Electronica: Vertebrate visual capacities by M.P. Rowe
Melissa Kaplan’s
Herp Care Collection: Reptile vision
Talk
Origins: Evolution of color vision
Seeing the whole-circle rainbow, WonderQuest
Why the second rainbow colors are backwards, WonderQuest
How rainbows form, WonderQuest
Glory (circle) rainbows seen from a plane, WonderQuest
Why the
inside of a rainbow is bright, WonderQuest
No 24-hour flu
Q:
I am the principal at a school in Missouri and I get parents calling all the
time saying "Johnny won't be at school today, he has the 24-hour flu". Having
taught science for 17 years I tell them there is no such thing. Where can I find
proof to back my claim? Brad, Chamois, Missouri
Influenza viruses [CDC]
A: The 24-hour flu does not exist, say the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The flu is a respiratory disease and not a
stomach or intestinal disease. The fever and body aches associated with the flu
lasts three to four days — not 24 hours.
"There is no such thing as the 24-hour flu," says Alaska’s
Environmental and Food Safety expert Nancy Napolilli. "It’s food poisoning."
If Johnny has the "24-hour flu" or food poisoning, he might
feel queasy all day. On the other hand, he could suffer intense abdominal pain
and diarrhea if he ate food contaminated, for example, by the bacteria called
Clostridium perfringes. These bacteria infest soils, intestines, and sewage.
So, you’re absolutely right. There’s no such thing as the
24-hour flu but the kid is really sick anyway.
By the way, to avoid these miseries: cook food long enough and
at a high enough temperature (above 140 degrees F, 60 degrees C) to kill
bacteria.
Further Surfing:
CDC: Influenza
Ohio
State University: Clostridium perfringesns, not the 24-hour flu
Gravitons carry gravity
Q:
If gravity is nothing but the bumps, depressions and warpings of geometrical
space-time, why is anybody talking about ‘gravitons’ to explain gravity? Doesn’t
Einstein's General Theory of Relativity do the job? — Peter
A model of Earth’s gravitational field based on satellite
data [University of Texas and NASA]
A: Trying to explain all the forces and elementary
particles in the Universe with a single theory — is the culprit.
Sure, we think Newton explained gravity wonderfully well.
Einstein extended Newton’s notions, giving us, as you say, insights into the
geometry of space and time. All that’s well established.
Then, why do we need gravitons? To pull all of physics under a
one-theory umbrella and to understand physics on a deeper level.
"If we hope to understand the unification of forces, the big
bang, cosmic inflation, or even certain details of black holes, we will surely
need a quantum theory of gravity at some point," says Steven Pollock, physics
professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder. (Related information: Steven
Pollock http://www.teach12.com/store/professor.asp?ID=251&d=Steven+Pollock)
Our present theory (the Standard Model of fundamental
particles and interactions) does explain the other two fundamental forces (the
strong and electroweak). We still, however, haven’t included gravity, although
Einstein tried.
First, a word about the forces the Standard Model covers. The
"strong interaction" is the force that binds protons and neutrons together to
form atomic nuclei. The "electroweak interaction" is actually two forces —
electromagnetism (electro) and radioactive decay (weak). We recently found out
that these two forces are different manifestations of the same force (electroweak).
We hope to use quantum mechanics and gravitons to bring
gravity into the Standard Model. A graviton is a hypothetical (we still haven’t
found any) elementary particle having no mass and no charge. We can think of the
gravitational attraction between two objects as the exchange of gravitons.
Gravitons are analogous to photons. Gravitons and photons — both massless —
travel at the speed of light.
Quantum mechanics says that light travels in particle packets
called photons. Photons carry the electromagnetic force. We know this to be true
experimentally. The quantum theory of electrodynamics works superbly — to
incredible accuracy. For example, the theory predicts the magnetic strength of
an electron to 11 decimal places: 2.00231930435. The unitless number (which
compares the electron intrinsic magnetic moment with a Bohr magneton) checks
with experiments.
That’s why we’re using quantum mechanics, with gravitons
instead of photons, to explain gravity. If we succeed, then we will be able to
explain every force (including gravity) and every elementary particle with a
single theory.
Further Surfing:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: The particle adventure
HyperPhysics by Rod Nave: How the fundamental forces work by exchanging
particles, like photons and gravitons
University of Texas and NASA: Animated model of Earth’s gravity field
(Answered Jan. 2, 2004)
|