A Formica ant suspends a drop of aphid honeydew between her mandibles (which bristle with 7 or more teeth), as she drinks it. 
		Photo courtesy of Alex Wild, copyright, used with permission.WonderQuest:  On the web since 1997...      

Home   Top 10    Newsletter   Answer a question    Site Map                                    
Solving mysteries
WonderQuest

with April Holladay
New!  WeatherQuesting
 
Google
 
Web www.WonderQuest.com

     
RSS Add to Google

Answers About:  

   Animals
   Humans  
   Astronomy 
   Physics
   Mathematics 
   Evolution/Genetics
   Earth 
   Technology
   Plants
   Airspace 
   Sky
   Art, TV, music...  
   Food 
   Oceans/climate 
   Chemistry
   Computers
   Microcreatures

Special Features:  

   Current Column
   Teachers' corner
   Newsletter
   Science book reviews
   Game reviews
   Tech talk
   Answer a question
   Forum
   Interact with nature

Question for readers to answer:

Macaque monkey,  Crab-eating macaque (Macaca fascicularis) in Lopburi, Thailand.  Photo courtesy of 'Chris huh' and Wikipedia.

If a human yawns in front of a monkey, will the monkey yawn?

Deadline:  June 4.  We will publish the best answers on June 9.

You get the credit.

Click here to give me your answer: Answer the question.


Interacting with nature by K:

How to Offer Wild Birds Shelter in the Winter

Not all birds migrate south for the winter.  Winter is a hard season for birds, and many risk freezing to death at night. It doesn't take much effort or money to provide shelter for them, and it can make a huge difference to the little feathered guys!

More Articles >>

 

 

No evidence that cell phones harm brains, bullets lag spacecraft

Q: How can cell phones damage your brain? (Amy, Saltburn, England)

Wireless phones are two-way radios and emit radio waves — radiation. [FDA]

A: So far, we don’t think cell phones do damage our brains.

"The available scientific evidence does not show that any health problems are associated with using wireless phones," says the US Food & Drug Administration on their website (updated July 2003).

I’ve searched the literature for evidence found since then and haven’t come up with much.

The closest thing to trouble that I’ve found — and it’s pretty inconclusive — is an experiment done by Dariusz Leszczynski (head of the Laboratory of Radiation Biology, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Finland) and reported on Dec. 7, 2004 at the Cytoskeletal Organization II.

Leszczynski grew human endothelial cells (cells that form liners in blood and lymph vessels) in a culture dish. He exposed the cells to radiation at GSM cell-phone frequencies (900 or 1800 MHz). He tested the cell genes and proteins after irradiating them. He found a protein (vimentin) that did change. Some expressions of this protein had an unusually low molecular weight.

This change in the vimentin protein is a biological effect. But, as Leszczynski points out, the change "does not automatically mean that there will be a health effect."

Vimentin is an important building block used in the framework of cells (cytoskeleton). It helps cells stick together to form tough structure. If that building block changes, it could conceivably create flaws in the cell structure. That, in turn, could cause problems with cell function.

So, Leszczynski plans to investigate more. He might find trouble — a real health hazard. But, so far, he hasn’t. Just a change in a protein.

This result just in (22 Dec. Reuter’s report): 12 European institutes conducted a 4-year study on human and animal cells in the laboratory. They exposed the cells to somewhat higher Specific Absorption Rates (0.3 to 2 watts per kilogram) than normal cell phone radiation (0.5 to 1 w/kg). Specific Absorption Rates  is a measure of heat in the tissues.

They found more breaks than normal in single and double strand DNA. The cells couldn’t repair some of the damage so the DNA breaks could be passed to the next generation. The researchers said the lab study did not prove any health risks but plan more studies.

How about studies that might relate brain cancer to cell phone use?

"I am not aware of any scientific population study that demonstrates any connection between cell phone use and brain cancer," said Neal Naff, the Chief of the Department of Neurology at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore. "There are, however, several well conducted population studies that show cell phone users are no more likely to develop brain cancers than people who do not use cell phones."

To answer your question, maybe cell-phone radiation can damage blood vessels in the brain or DNA. It’s conceivable but we have no evidence that this actually happens. And, as Naff says:

"On a more practical level, all neurosurgeons I know use cell phones extensively. If there were credible evidence that cell phones cause brain cancer, I can assure you that neurosurgeons would not be using them."

Further Reading:

American Society for Cell Biology: Cell phone radiation shows biological effects on cytoskeleton by John Fleischman

USA Today Tech: Phone makers ask for more research into DNA damage

FDA: Do wireless phones pose a health hazard

FDA: Wireless phones as radios

Networks and Telecommunications Research: Definition of Specific Absorption Rates

Q: Which goes faster, bullets or rockets, and how much faster? (Ibrahim, Long Beach, California)

A: Rockets go about 25 times faster than the fastest bullet. If a bullet went as fast as a rocket, it would escape Earth’s gravity and keep going — perhaps to Mars.

Indeed, Earth’s escape velocity (ignoring air friction) is almost 10 times the fastest bullet — 25,000 mph (40320 km/h).

Spacecraft speed. In 2001, the spacecraft Odyssey left Earth for Mars at about 67,100 mph (108000 km/h) and cruised thereafter at about 54,000 mph (87000 km/h).

Bullet speed. The fastest bullet (probably the Winchester .223 Super Short Magnum) has a muzzle velocity of about 4000 feet per second or 2,700 mph (4400 km/h). Faster than a speeding bullet — scarcely measures up.

Odyssey launches for Mars. April 7, 2001 [NASA/JPL/KSC]

Further Reading:

WonderQuest: How fast spacecraft cruise

Shooting Times Research Center: Winchester’s new .223 super short magnum by Dick Metcalf

(Answered Dec. 31, 2004)

 

Site Map

Question Archive Features Info
Animals Sky ▪  WonderQuest's ▪  Correspondents' Contributors
Humans Art, TV, music   Ask a question   Interact with nature About April
Astronomy Food   Top 10 questions   Book reviews April's blog
Mathematics Oceans & climate    Forum   Game reviews Newspapers with WonderQuest:
Evolution & genetics Chemistry   Answer the question   Tech talk   Globe and Mail
Earth Computers   Newsletter     Happy News
Technology Microcreatures   Further reading     Corrales Comment
Plants     Fast answers    
Aerospace USA Today      

Copyright 2008 by April Holladay